Is the New York Times done with their blackout of UFO coverage?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/opinion/29pope.html?ex=1217995200&en=261a4fac954a0495&ei=5070&emc=eta1
Today they ran the op-ed above by Nick Pope, who I've seen speak in person a couple of times.
Nick Pope worked at the Ministry of Defense (MOD) in England. His job was to investigate UFO's to make sure they didn't pose a threat to national security. The United States spent years also investigating UFO's but after deciding there was no national security threat, the US 'publicly' stopped investigating UFO's.
Nick Pope was initially skeptical about UFO's, but during the course of his job he realized there is a significant percentage of UFO reports that can not be explained. Nick supposedly left his job at the MOD and now speaks openly about the importance of investigating this phenomena and he also keeps up to date with the MOD's public release of previously classified files. As mentioned before, both France and the UK have opened up many of their previously classified unexplained UFO files to the general public.
Having seen Nick in person and followed his work, I have a sneaking suspicion that Nick still works for the MOD. He always seems very coy about his real opinion and I have a hunch he has much more knowledge than he lets on and perhaps his 'real' job is to both get people used to this phenomena and gauge both public reaction/opinion.
You probably think that's crazy, but believe you me, there is more arbitrarily strange deception in this field than any of you will ever know. Want proof of how strange it gets? Read well known French Astrophysicist and very successful Technology entrepreneur Jacque Vallee's book 'Revelations', which is available on Amazon. Jacque is one of the most thorough researchers in this field of all time and in this book he discusses how much deception and how deep this stuff gets with strong thorough research - http://www.amazon.com/REVELATIONS-Alien-Contact-Human-Deception/dp/1933665300/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1217339140&sr=1-5
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment